top of page

Academic

CAMPUS

URBANISM

MPhil Architecture and Urban Design

Cambridge Design Research Studio - CDRS

 

Design Supervisors:

Ingrid Schroder

Conrad Koslowsky

-

Stage 02 project 

-

Urban restructuring project

UMIST CAMPUS, MANCHESTER

RESTRUCTURING THE 1960s UNIVERSITY CAMPUS 

This project seeks to physically and programmatically restructure the former UMIST Campus, balancing the economic imperative for reinvention with the environmental imperative for retention. Judicious decisions concerning the value of the existing buildings drive this project. The design emerges from over a year’s research into the spatial qualities of modernist architecture and postwar campuses, producing an informed alternative to comprehensive redevelopment.

The ambition for the project is to create a city micro-district, reprogramming the single use university campus in favour of a heterogeneous mix of uses and an amplified sense of urbanity. New uses are found for old buildings: lecture theatres become cinemas, large labs become sports halls, towers become communal apartments - saving a vast quantum of embodied carbon. At the heart of the campus a new civic and cultural centre - the Aula - anchors public activity within the district. The former UMIST Campus is transformed into a city within the city.

Using an infill strategy, a series of coherent new buildings replace low rise lab buildings which contribute little to the campus environment. Whilst retained campus buildings are reframed and their significance heightened by the creation of a new urban setting. The objective of this dual reinvention/retention strategy is to introduce a critical mass of inhabitants and workers into the campus whilst preserving its unique attributes, in order to adapt the campus from an institutional enclave into a mixed use urban quarter.

precinct - relationship of new buildings (grey) to existing buildings (red)
rain garden.jpg
site plan (retained in red).jpg

A CITY WITHIN THE CITY

CAMPUS AS FORUM

The university campus in the city poses a unique relationship of a self-contained polity within a larger urban environment, acting as a nested city, or an alternative city. The heterotopian condition of the campus is spliced back into the urban grid under this project, whilst re-asserting its unique identity with respect to the city at large. Campus Urbanism takes the latent qualities of the campus environment to generate an urban forum comprising a wider spectrum of civic society than its once rarefied collegiate purpose - in order to establish a communitarian urban quarter.

New campus architecture

ESTABLISHING COHESION

ANALOGUE ARCHITECTURE

Based on research into the form of modernist campuses - in order to develop a site and type-specific architectural response - the proposed architecture of new campus buildings can be understood to be analogous. Facades based on the composition of mass and grid apply to both new and existing buildings, insofar as to be mimetic of the modernist building stock. The frame acts as a primary architectural trope which provides a consistent tectonic rhythm for new campus architecture, one which permits a greater expression and use of the facade.

precinct 2.jpg
Strategy - stage 1: aula
Strategy - stage 2: infill
Strategy - stage 3: adaptive reuse
Strategy - stage 4: common ground

BRIDGING ARCHITECTURE AND URBANISM

Precinct - relationship of new (grey) and existing buildings (red)

LARGE SCALE URBAN RECONFIGURATION 

Campus design is reliant on the interrelationships between buildings over their autonomy. Here, the process of campus restructuring falls into multiple categories; first, the Aula; second, selective demolition and infill with new buildings; third, adaptive reuse of existing buildings; fourth, a common ground landscape. Therefore, the fomal intent of the project is to balance proposed and existing architecture, and establish cohesion through spatial order. However, it does more than create physical unity from diverse parts, but develops an urban idea which seeks to create from a redundant urban environment, a complete and significant city quarter which is more than the sum of its parts.

townscape view 1 - text.jpg
townscape view 2 - text.jpg
tower and podium.jpg
tower and podium interface with existing sculptural wall
frame worms eye

TOWER AND PODIUM

TYPOLOGICAL TRANSFER

In order to establish a resonant spatiality between new and existing, the architecture of the proposed buildings respect the pre-existing tower and podium type. A mid-level break between the tower and podium allows the each tower to express its monumental qualities on the skyline, whilst below the podium encloses the townscape. At ground level, the building line is recessed to accommodate projecting bays, aedicular entrance structures, and specific elements which reduce the magnitude of each building to a scale familiar to the individual.

frame worms eye

FRAMES AND PLATFORMS

A SCAFFOLD FOR NEW USE

To facilitate adaptive reuse of existing buildings, a scaffold approach is taken to enabling their new purpose. Involving the lining of building envelopes with new frames, this serves a twofold purpose in correcting their building fabric, while simultaneously opening the facades for terraces, and projecting window elements. The depth of the structure allows for individual appropriation of the facade, projecting internal life into the public realm.

relationship of existing tower and proposed frame within central bay
view of existing buildings (midground) and proposed buildings (foreground and background) seen from the railway viaduct
Atlas Way LR.jpg
The precinct as a spatial form
precinct 3.jpg

A SEQUENCE OF CITY ROOMS

PRECINCTUAL PLANNING

A spatial form which the project seeks to reinstate is that of the precinct. Precinctual planning proposes pedestrian areas with enclosed spatial envelopes in such a way to create a heightened urban experience - based on rhythms of exposure and enclosure - and the sense of ‘city rooms’. Within the wider campus plan, the precincts, each marked by a chequerboard square, represent points of concentration where activity and space reciprocate to create a relation between the citizen and the city, a setting for civic life.

campus hall revised.jpg
Deck access frame

THE INHABITED FACADE

CREATING DEPTH

In a critique and counterpoint to the immediacy between interior and exterior of the existing building stock, the new architecture of the campus subtracts the space behind the frame in order to provide a civic depth to the building edge. Resulting in a series of loggias, colonnades and arcades, the recessed building line creates a sheltered intermediate zone and a space which filters between individual and collective interests. In one key instance at the centre of the campus, a section of an existing building is entirely hollowed- out behind its facade to create a semi-internal ‘Campus Hall’. Within, key public artworks are concentrated in a partially enclosed loggia as a space given over to unprogrammed public use and temporary event.

Campus Hall exploded
The campus edge - gateway structures

SATELLITE ELEMENTS

New routes into the campus from the city are driven through existing barriers to movement, enhancing the porosity of the site. The campus grid is extended beyond its limits into the city grid, marked at their junction by freestanding satellite elements such as gateways and sheltered colonnades, which form static points to recognise the transition between twin conditions. From the campus threshold, the site remains appreciable as a distinct urban quarter, intensifying its appearance as a city within a city of a different spatial order.

Threshold structure
Project directory.jpg

PROJECT DIRECTORY 

click for further detail on stage 2 of the project

bottom of page